Tuesday, June 06, 2006

 

Election Day Today


In part two of ValleyVue's special coverage of the California Primary Election, statewide issues and those of special interest to the Central Valley are discussed. Today, June 6, 2006, is the day set for the election. Fully participate in your rights by voting in today's primary.

There are several issues up for vote in today's Gubernatorial Primary Election. Today's Blog Entry will first talk about the statewide propositions. Following that will be a variety of Valley measures on the ballot.

Proposition 81: California Reading and Literacy Improvement and Public library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 2006

Vote Yes on 81. This proposition allows the State of California to borrow $600 Million to help support local library districts in renovating and building new library branches. Interestingly, both the supporters of the proposition and the opponents recognize the pressing need for library funding.

California has seen huge rates of population growth within the past few decades. Libraries have not grown to keep up with the population. The Valley has seen new cities spring up, where previously there were fields. For example, Elk Grove, south of Sacramento, became incorporated and soon after claimed a population of over 100,000. Elk Grove's main library branch is in a small building with parking for no more than 20, almost comically trying to serve such a large community.

Furthermore, technology has changed many of the functions of libraries, as the increasingly mandatory internet is accessed by the unconnected masses. New libraries, larger and more useful facilities are a necessity.

The opponents of this proposition do not dispute the need for libraries, but wish to force politicians to hurt the state's poor in order to gain funds. They want to see welfare reformed to obtain the funds. Lady Bird Johnson once said, "Perhaps no place in any community is so totally democratic as the town library. The only entrance requirement is interest." Libraries have historically been one of the highest priorities of public funds. In conjunction with modern public schools, it allows for all people, regardless of background, to gain knowledge. It is sickening that some would like to see the fair and necessary expansion of libraries halted in order to further an incongruent political position.

Proposition 82: Preschool Education. Tax on Incomes over $400,000 for Individuals, $800,000 for Couples. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.

If you read the ValleyVue analysis of Proposition 81, you probably know what's coming with Prop 82. It is hard not to think that people who make huge sums of money in California, often by benefiting from the hard work or support of much poorer people, should not have to participate in some "profit-sharing". An individual that makes $400,000 in California is making as much as 25 full-time workers making minimum wage. It is virtually guaranteed that the individual is not working 25 times as much as those earning minimum wage. This is not to say we should all be earning the same amount, but Californians considered super-rich should be required to do more than others in financially contributing to solve societal ills.

Right now, preschool is available almost exclusively as a private service. Public preschool programs do exist, but are not prevalent. Right now, 65% of four year olds are enrolled in preschools, daycare, or babysitting programs. There is definitely a need for preschool age kids to be at the very least taken care of outside the home. It is hard to argue that 4 year olds would not be better served by being enrolled in an educational setting with credentialled staff. Vote Yes on 82.

Other Valley Measures on the Ballot:

Get out and vote!

_________________________

Source: Official Voter Information Guide, California Secretary of State website, Official Websites for Butte, Yuba, Placer, Yolo, San Joaquin, Madera, Fresno, and Kern Counties.


Thursday, June 01, 2006

 

Primary Election, part 1

In Part One of ValleyVue's coverage of the Gubernatorial Primary Election, the race for Democratic nominee will be discussed. ValleyVue will soon cover election news pertaining to some of the candidates and issues most crucial to the fabric of life in the Central Valley.

The California State Primary Election on June 6 will focus on one major race--the one for the Democratic gubernatorial candidacy. If registered for a party, California voters must only vote using that party's ballot. Unaffiliated voters will be given a nonpartisan ballot, or they may request a Republican, Democrat, or American Independent ballot to help nominate the candidates for their parties.

This year, Republicans and Democrats are likely the only parties able to successfully run for governor. Arnold Schwarzenegger, although facing three other Republicans, will certainly get the candidacy for his party as the incumbent. The Democrats have a tight race between Phil Angelides and Steve Westly. As this appears to be the most important race in the election, ValleyVue recommends requesting the Democrat ballot for all nonpartisan voters. Other than the governor race, the Democrat's ballot also features a race between Insurance commissioner John Garamendi and State Senators Liz Figueroa and Jackie Speier for Lieutenant Governor nominee. Oakland mayor (and former governor) Jerry Brown and gang prosecutor Rocky Delgadillo are seeking the nomination for Attorney General.

Westly and Angelides--the heavyweight bout of this election--is a hard choice. Interestingly enough, this is not a case of two look-alike candidates, although the differences will certainly grow more distinct on June 7th as the Democratic candidate then turns to face Arnold. In the mean time, the Democrats face the dangerous competition between two honored sons. While the media is portraying the negative ads by the two competitors as destructive to the parties chances at a win in November, it must be remembered that primary election battles are always portrayed that way in the media.

In this case, Westly and Angelides have successfully separated from each other. However, most striking is that what is remembered is each candidate's negative attacks of the other. Westly has attacked Angelides on his destruction of Valley wetlands in his career as a developer. Angelides has said Westly will not fully fund education, choosing to rely on lottery funds, but Westly cites his history as a former classroom teacher to prove his devotion to education. Westly attacks Angelides for advocating for tax raises, which Westly suggests could be gained through programs such as taxpayer amnesty to recoup taxes not collected.

The attacks continue to come from both sides. Interestingly, the candidates sometimes even attack each other for running negative campaigns. From Steve Westly's website: "Who will Democratic voters choose? Westly is upbeat and attractive; Angelides is pinch-faced and whiny. Westly is pragmatic and relaxed; Angelides is histrionic and obsessed with himself." (Jill Stuart, LA Daily News). Definitely not an above the board tactic by Westly to reprint one reporter's observation of character deficiencies for Angelides. After Westly blasted Angelides for taking campaign contributions from oil and energy companies, Angelides fired back, reminding the Westly had "invested millions of his own money in oil companies, oil drilling companies and chemical companies." Angelides fought by publicly supporting a new tax on oil drillers to develop alternative fuels, a possible ballot initiative that Westly made no stand for or against.

Westly's past is one of business. He worked for eBay, helping to build the company into a major force on the internet. Phil Angelides worked as a developer, mostly in Sacramento, where he was born. Westly attacks Angelides for accepting donations from Angelo Tsakopoulos, a huge Sacramento developer, but it seems fairly obvious why another developer from the same area might support the Angelides campaign. Westly may have missed the mark to suggest this is a sign Angelides would be unduly influenced by developers like Tsakopolous. Angelides has for years served the public, most recently as the State Treasurer. He gained notoriety as being one of the highest-ranking officials to stand against Schwarzenegger's proposals in last year's special election.

In development, one of the most high profile communities Angelides was involved in was Elk Grove's Laguna West neighborhood. Laguna West won many awards for the design of a "livable community". The neighborhood boasts tightly packed single family homes designed to allow for interactions between neighbors, as many recreational activities are pushed from the backyard to the front, as well as trying to allow residents the opportunity to walk to businesses if they wanted. Laguna West in some ways never lived up to the dreams of its makers, though. Designed in some ways to be an independent Sacramento county community with its own town center, development steadily crept eastward, and Elk Grove annexed the neighborhood to become a 100,000 + city. Business in the town center area never really caught on, and recently land meant to be commercial has instead become multi-family housing. Although housing prices are still strong, crime is becoming a bigger problem yearly in Laguna West, as it is throughout Elk Grove. However, the design principles are solid, and Laguna West is recognized as a pioneering development for the region. It is imitated often.

Angelides and Westly do have many things in common, and either one will make for a compelling race leading up to November. Angelides appears to be a real fighter, looking to take on issues directly. Many ideas he espouses point to the direct approach, even if it means pain for some. Californians expect a strong, multifaceted state government, and they want to get it as cheaply as possible. Angelides understands the pressing need, and will work to create new revenue streams to allow for the funding of programs California demands. Westly's ideas on fiscal responsibility have merit, and should be considered, especially regarding the recovery of taxes already legally due to the state. Angelides may be a bit more wide-ranging in his understanding of the state's needs. Unfortunately, if he is being attacked by another Democrat for tax stance, you can bet Angelides will have an uphill climb against Republican governor Schwarzenegger.

ValleyVue recommends Phil Angelides for Democratic Gubernatorial Nominee. Throw in a vote for Delgadillo for Attorney General.
___________________
Sources: http://www.angelides.com/, http://www.westly2006.com, www.latimes.com, Official Voter Information Guide

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?